| Title |
It’s The Prices, Stupid: Why The United States Is So Different From Other Countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Affairs, May 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1377/hlthaff.22.3.89 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gerard F. Anderson, Uwe E. Reinhardt, Peter S. Hussey, Varduhi Petrosyan |
| Abstract |
This paper uses the latest data from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) to compare the health systems of the thirty member countries in 2000. Total health spending--the distribution of public and private health spending in the OECD countries--is presented and discussed. U.S. public spending as a percentage of GDP (5.8 percent) is virtually identical to public spending in the United Kingdom, Italy, and Japan (5.9 percent each) and not much smaller than in Canada (6.5 percent). The paper also compares pharmaceutical spending, health system capacity, and use of medical services. The data show that the United States spends more on health care than any other country. However, on most measures of health services use, the United States is below the OECD median. These facts suggest that the difference in spending is caused mostly by higher prices for health care goods and services in the United States. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 287 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 158 | 55% |
| Canada | 5 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Comoros | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 12 | 4% |
| Unknown | 102 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 207 | 72% |
| Scientists | 33 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 28 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 18 | 6% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 488 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 470 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 85 | 17% |
| Researcher | 62 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 56 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 8% |
| Other | 35 | 7% |
| Other | 115 | 24% |
| Unknown | 94 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 104 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 83 | 17% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 52 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 38 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 23 | 5% |
| Other | 67 | 14% |
| Unknown | 121 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1811. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2023.
All research outputs
#5,317
of 24,857,051 outputs
Outputs from Health Affairs
#9
of 6,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2
of 53,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Affairs
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,857,051 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,444 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.