↓ Skip to main content

Return On Investment From Childhood Immunization In Low- And Middle-Income Countries, 2011–20

Overview of attention for article published in Health Affairs, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
29 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
policy
6 policy sources
twitter
788 X users
facebook
15 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
250 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
458 Mendeley
Title
Return On Investment From Childhood Immunization In Low- And Middle-Income Countries, 2011–20
Published in
Health Affairs, February 2016
DOI 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1086
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sachiko Ozawa, Samantha Clark, Allison Portnoy, Simrun Grewal, Logan Brenzel, Damian G Walker

Abstract

An analysis of return on investment can help policy makers support, optimize, and advocate for the expansion of immunization programs in the world's poorest countries. We assessed the return on investment associated with achieving projected coverage levels for vaccinations to prevent diseases related to ten antigens in ninety-four low- and middle-income countries during 2011-20, the Decade of Vaccines. We derived these estimates by using costs of vaccines, supply chains, and service delivery and their associated economic benefits. Based on the costs of illnesses averted, we estimated that projected immunizations will yield a net return about 16 times greater than costs over the decade (uncertainty range: 10-25). Using a full-income approach, which quantifies the value that people place on living longer and healthier lives, we found that net returns amounted to 44 times the costs (uncertainty range: 27-67). Across all antigens, net returns were greater than costs. But to realize the substantial positive return on investment from immunization programs, it is essential that governments and donors provide the requisite investments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 788 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 458 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 458 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 84 18%
Researcher 51 11%
Student > Bachelor 47 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 9%
Other 28 6%
Other 60 13%
Unknown 147 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 87 19%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 35 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 23 5%
Social Sciences 22 5%
Other 98 21%
Unknown 160 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 899. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2023.
All research outputs
#19,644
of 25,726,194 outputs
Outputs from Health Affairs
#63
of 6,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#280
of 409,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Affairs
#2
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,726,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,542 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 69.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,710 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.