↓ Skip to main content

New Neighborhood Grocery Store Increased Awareness Of Food Access But Did Not Alter Dietary Habits Or Obesity

Overview of attention for article published in Health Affairs, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
43 news outlets
blogs
11 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
62 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
369 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
537 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
New Neighborhood Grocery Store Increased Awareness Of Food Access But Did Not Alter Dietary Habits Or Obesity
Published in
Health Affairs, February 2014
DOI 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0512
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven Cummins, Ellen Flint, Stephen A. Matthews

Abstract

National and local policies to improve diet in low-income US populations include increasing physical access to grocery stores and supermarkets in underserved neighborhoods. In a pilot study that evaluated the impacts of opening a new supermarket in a Philadelphia community considered a "food desert"-part of the Pennsylvania Fresh Food Financing Initiative-we found that the intervention moderately improved residents' perceptions of food accessibility. However, it did not lead to changes in reported fruit and vegetable intake or body mass index. The effectiveness of interventions to improve physical access to food and reduce obesity by encouraging supermarkets to locate in underserved areas therefore remains unclear. Nevertheless, the present findings suggest that simply improving a community's retail food infrastructure may not produce desired changes in food purchasing and consumption patterns. Complementary policy changes and interventions may be needed to help consumers bridge the gap between perception and action. The replication of our findings in other settings and research into the factors that influence community residents' receptivity to improved food access are urgently required.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 62 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 537 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Unknown 524 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 118 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 76 14%
Researcher 54 10%
Student > Bachelor 53 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 47 9%
Other 97 18%
Unknown 92 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 136 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 91 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 62 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 5%
Environmental Science 15 3%
Other 78 15%
Unknown 130 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 473. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2021.
All research outputs
#57,680
of 25,769,258 outputs
Outputs from Health Affairs
#177
of 6,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#418
of 325,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Affairs
#2
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,769,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,540 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 69.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.