↓ Skip to main content

Modeling The Economic Burden Of Adult Vaccine-Preventable Diseases In The United States

Overview of attention for article published in Health Affairs, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
48 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
302 X users
facebook
14 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
123 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
Title
Modeling The Economic Burden Of Adult Vaccine-Preventable Diseases In The United States
Published in
Health Affairs, October 2016
DOI 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0462
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sachiko Ozawa, Allison Portnoy, Hiwote Getaneh, Samantha Clark, Maria Knoll, David Bishai, H Keri Yang, Pallavi D Patwardhan

Abstract

Vaccines save thousands of lives in the United States every year, but many adults remain unvaccinated. Low rates of vaccine uptake lead to costs to individuals and society in terms of deaths and disabilities, which are avoidable, and they create economic losses from doctor visits, hospitalizations, and lost income. To identify the magnitude of this problem, we calculated the current economic burden that is attributable to vaccine-preventable diseases among US adults. We estimated the total remaining economic burden at approximately $9 billion (plausibility range: $4.7-$15.2 billion) in a single year, 2015, from vaccine-preventable diseases related to ten vaccines recommended for adults ages nineteen and older. Unvaccinated individuals are responsible for almost 80 percent, or $7.1 billion, of the financial burden. These results not only indicate the potential economic benefit of increasing adult immunization uptake but also highlight the value of vaccines. Policies should focus on minimizing the negative externalities or spillover effects from the choice not to be vaccinated, while preserving patient autonomy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 302 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 149 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 19 12%
Other 18 12%
Researcher 16 10%
Other 27 18%
Unknown 25 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9 6%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Other 34 22%
Unknown 33 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 620. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2022.
All research outputs
#36,685
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Health Affairs
#118
of 6,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#692
of 327,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Affairs
#3
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,542 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 69.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,143 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.